Maaf Zahir & Batin

8TV needs to be ashamed of itself. Learn a lesson.

Hancur 1Malaysia

Oh my goodness. I had so many good things happen to me today but I’ve decided to blog about them another time because this just pissed me off! JAIS JAKIM has come up with guidelines on for Muslims celebration non-Muslim festivals.

WTF??

I have learned today that it is now ill-advised for non-Muslims to invite Muslims to attend and participate in any sort of religious festivities. Come on, if it is a religious festivity, there’s definitely going to be some amount of religious activity going on.

Instead of understanding and building bridges, our religious authorities are building walls.

Let’s be frank, the rest of us get Islamic rites shoved down our throats throughout our lives. Islamic prayers are recited at almost every function including at school assemblies. The rest of us maintain a respectful silence when this goes on but if the reverse were to happen, the Muslims would risk being fined or charged in court.

Now, I wonder what would happen if the non-Muslims followed the JAIS guidelines, but in reverse instead? It would be thorough chaos. No matter what the politicians say, Malaysia is not an Islamic state.

I shall produce the guidelines here ad-verbatim:

The 68th muzakarah of the National Fatwa Committee for Islamic Religious Affairs on April 12, 2005 discussed the Guidelines For Muslims Celebrating Religious Festivals Of Non-Muslims. The muzakarah has decided that:

In determining the non-Muslim celebrations that can be attended by Muslims, several main criteria should serve as guidelines so as not to contradict the teachings of Islam. The criteria are as follows:

  1. The event is not accompanied by ceremonies that are against the Islamic faith (aqidah).

    The meaning of “against the Islamic faith (aqidah)” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will lead to tarnishing the faith (aqidah) of Muslims.

    For example:

    • to include religious symbols such as the cross, installing lights, candles, Christmas tree and so forth;
    • to sing religious songs;
    • to put any religious markings on the forehead, or other markings onto parts of the body;
    • to deliver speech or gestures in the form of a praise to the non-Muslim religion;
    • to bow or conduct acts of honour to the religious ceremony of non-Muslims.
  2. The event is not accompanied by acts against the Islamic law.

    The meaning of “against the Islamic law” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will contradict the Islamic teachings practised by the Muslim community.

    For example:

    • Wearing red costumes like Santa Claus or other garments that reflect religion;
    • Serving intoxicating food or beverages and the likes;
    • Having sounds or ornaments like church bells, Christmas tree, temple or breaking of coconuts;
    • Having ceremonies with elements of gaming, worship, cult, superstitions and the likes.
  3. The event is not accompanied by “acts that contradict with moral and cultural development of Muslim society” in this country.

    The meaning of “acts that contradict with moral and cultural development of Muslim society” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will contradict the values and norms of the Muslim society of this country which adheres to the Islamic teachings based on Ahlus Sunnah Wal-Jamaah.

    For example:

    • Mixing freely without any limit or manners;
    • Wearing conspicuous clothing;
    • Singing songs that contain lyrics of obscenity and worship;
    • Organising programmes such as beauty pageants, cock fighting and such.
  4. The event is not accompanied by acts that can “stir the sensitivity of Muslim community”.

    The meaning of “stir the sensitivity of Muslim community” is a thing, act, word or situation which if conducted will offend the feelings of Muslims about their beliefs and practices.

    For Example:

    • Speeches or songs in the form of non-Muslim religious propaganda;
    • Speeches that insult the Muslims;
    • Speeches that insult Islam;
    • Presentations with the aim to ridicule the religious belief of Muslims.
  5. The organisers and the public are asked to get the views of religious authorities before organising or attending celebrations of non-Muslims.

Update@2011-08-22: As rightly pointed out below, the guidelines are from JAKIM.

Suing for a Scholarship

Disclaimer: I was a government scholar at Cambridge.

I read an article in TheStar a couple of days ago, about a teenager suing a GLC – Khazanah – for failing to get a scholarship to read Natural Sciences at Cambridge. From the article, “… to sue Khazanah Nasional Bhd, Yayasan Khazanah and its director after his son failed to get a scholarship offered by the foundation and the Cambridge Commonwealth Trust.”

Amazing!

After reading about the suit further, “Chan is seeking to invalidate the three scholarships already given out by the national investment company. Further to that he claims compensation and damages for distress and embarrassment due to being rejected.”

I thought to myself – what a well angled suit. It threatens to cause a huge public relations problem for Khazanah by seeking to nullify the other scholarships, and also claims a large amount of unquantifiable damages and compensation for emotional distress.

In the past, when someone did not get a scholarship, they would just swallow their lumps and move one. It may not have been fair but it built character at least. In 1999, someone cried to the news media and opened the flood-gates so that any crier would get a scholarship. Today, someone has up-the-ante by suing for a scholarship. I hope that the government settles out of court and awards the scholarship. That would bring the game to a whole other level – the height of incredulity!

I think that it is a great idea to sue for one reason – to highlight the systemic problems that plague the scholarship system in our country. We all know that there are serious problems with our scholarship system that get dragged out into the public eye annually for the last decade. Maybe it’s about time someone dragged it out in the courts.

I hope that this lawsuit would at least trigger a revamp of the system and a return to sanity.

It’s frakkin’ broke!

PS: That said, I think that it’ll do his son loads of damage at Cambridge but a father has to do what he has to do to help his son. As a retiring lawyer, he’s fighting the system with the best tool that he has.

Streisand Effect

After reading an article in TheStar where our PM admitted that, “the Government’s censorship of The Economist’s article on Bersih last month was ineffective and said that its censorship methods would be reviewed. Only one line was censored, but the act of censoring made more news than the news itself.”

Our home ministry definitely blacked-out more than a single line of The Economist. Whole paragraphs were covered up with black markers. However, the online edition was untouched and everyone with an Internet connection could read the entire article under the black.

I’d like to take this opportunity to introduce our PM (and his cousin) to the Streisand Effect where, “an attempt to hide or remove a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely.”

Our government should just get rid of censorship altogether because in the open world of the Internet, no censorship will be effective. You’ve got to learn how to work with the data and influence the conversation, not try to stamp it out.

That’s the one lesson that our present government has yet to learn.

Maybe it’s time to introduce them to Robert J Sawyer too.

Religious Nerds

http://www.collegehumor.com/moogaloop/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=6583358&use_node_id=true&fullscreen=1

JAIS need a new hobby (and more sex).

Big Cameron

I watched the speech given by David Cameron, the UK Prime Minister, in an emergency parliament sitting. Boy, I wish that we had a parliament like that.

However, what caught my attention was the stance taken by Mr Cameron including, the threat to cut out certain Internet services if they are used for criminal activity and the increase in the number of police and use of police force on the ground, particularly the part where he refused to back down on considering all options including military, when pressed.

1-9-8-4

I don’t think that it’s the right stance to take.

Fighting words must ultimately be backed with fighting force.

Donald Lim is a Lame Duck

I just read an article in TMI, which says that, “Datuk Donald Lim has pledged to relinquish his post if the Barisan Nasional (BN) party fails to capture more seats in the frontline state in the coming polls.” Personally, I think that he should just quit anyway – regardless of how MCA does in the coming polls. He is a lame duck who cannot even quack properly.

While I don’t know him personally, I still remember watching his public debate against Chua Jui Meng on live TV. It was then that I realised how terrible he is as a politician. As long as he does not open his mouth, I can still give him the benefit of a doubt but not after.

I think that he will do MCA a favour if he steps aside to let the younger generation of leaders come up. While I do not know of anyone worth voting for within MCA, I still think that MCA should be able to do better than him. Otherwise, it’s just kinda sad.

The way that things are going for them, MCA seem destined to join their Gerakan brothers and sisters in the coming GE.